Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Date: 2011-05-09 19:31:15
Message-ID: 1304969330-sup-1882@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun may 09 14:31:33 -0400 2011:

> I'm happy enough with that set of guidelines: namely, that we'd use
> src/extension only for things that don't require additional
> dependencies, and not for things that build standalone executables.
> If we're going to move things around, I think we should take the
> trouble to categorize them along the way, and your idea of inserting
> one more subdirectory under src/extension for grouping seems fine to
> me.

For executables we already have src/bin. Do we really need a separate
place for, say, pg_standby or pg_upgrade?

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-05-09 19:51:21 Re: Collation mega-cleanups
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-05-09 19:04:09 Inconsistent treatment of serials in pg_dump