Re: can postgres do this?

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: can postgres do this?
Date: 1999-10-15 04:43:13
Message-ID: 3806B0E1.9458EB35@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(on list; interesting topic)

> Tom, I'm looking at an oracle script and seeing something I haven't seen
> before. Is this something oracle specific? Can Postgres do it?
> CREATE OR REPLACE procedure inc_char_for_sort_key (old_char IN OUT CHAR,
> carry_p OUT INTEGER)
> It goes on, but it's the CREATE OR REPLACE part that I'm interested in.

That's interesting. In our case, you would do a "drop function" and
then the "create function" as a two step process. Oracle simplifies it
a bit for you. I'm not sure why we throw an error if you drop a
function which does not exist, since that makes it tough to blindly do
the "drop/create" pair. Why don't we just signal a warning or notice
instead?

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-15 04:50:25 int8 type
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-10-15 04:33:32 Re: [HACKERS] bison