Re: [HACKERS] bison

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] bison
Date: 1999-10-15 04:33:32
Message-ID: 3806AE9C.929B5F2A@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

> >> You might want to include into the installation instructions (or whereever
> >> it will end up) that GNU bison 1.25 is required. (right after the flex
> >> stuff)
> > We haven't been careful about building and shipping the bison output
> > in the tarball distribution, as we have for the main parser.
> Huh? src/tools/release_prep automatically builds both the main parser
> and ecpg bison output files. Is there other stuff it should be
> handling too?

afaik some of Jan's language stuff uses yacc also...

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1999-10-15 10:18:24 Re: [HACKERS] bison
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-15 02:37:03 Why I am writing a book

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-10-15 04:43:13 Re: can postgres do this?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-15 02:37:03 Why I am writing a book