Re: [HACKERS] patches

From: Leon <leon(at)udmnet(dot)ru>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] patches
Date: 1999-09-16 07:32:20
Message-ID: 37E09D04.8B342772@udmnet.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> Okay, using 'diff -cr --new-file' to create the patches, I've created one
> from 6.5->6.5.1 and one from 6.5.1->6.5.2 ... I'm downloading everything
> to my computer right now to see how the patches work (if they work), but
> if anyone else wants to try, they are up on the site and ready to go...
>
> If there is somethign else I should be using for that diff, please feel
> free to mention it and I'll do it all over again...

I'm experiencing some strange problems with that patches. First,
my Netscape shows their sizes as approx. 200-300 k. But being downloaded,
they are 2-3 megs of size. Second, occasionally I had to download a
patch (6.5.1->6.5.2) twice, one immediately after another. They were
different! There was some strings of difference in the middle of
the patch. Maybe it was Netscape's quirks. Hope so. As to patches
themselves, they seem to be Ok, though I couldn't test them by
compiling source (my source tree is somehow slightly damaged), there
were no unreasonable hunk fails. I had to use -p1 option with the
patch to strip top-level dir which is called different on my system.

--
Leon.
-------
He knows he'll never have to answer for any of his theories actually
being put to test. If they were, they would be contaminated by reality.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christof Petig 1999-09-16 12:20:48 Is there a maintainer for ecpg? patch included
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-09-16 03:03:53 Join syntax