From: | Leon <leon(at)udmnet(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Status report: long-query-string changes |
Date: | 1999-09-13 13:34:56 |
Message-ID: | 37DCFD80.2886C65F@udmnet.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > Thomas Lockhart should speak up - he seems the only person who
> > has objections yet. If the proposed thing is to be declined, something
> > has to be applied instead in respect to lexer reject feature and
> > accompanying size limits, as well as grammar inconsistency.
>
> Hmm. I'd suggest that we go with the "greedy lexer" solution, which
> continues to gobble characters which *could* be an operator until
> other characters or whitespace are encountered.
'Xcuse my dumbness ;) , but is it in any way different from
what is proposed (by me and some others?)
--
Leon.
-------
He knows he'll never have to answer for any of his theories actually
being put to test. If they were, they would be contaminated by reality.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Leon | 1999-09-13 13:35:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Status report: long-query-string changes |
Previous Message | Ansley, Michael | 1999-09-13 08:16:54 | RE: [HACKERS] Status report: long-query-string changes |