Re: Isn't wait_for_catchup slightly broken?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Isn't wait_for_catchup slightly broken?
Date: 2022-01-16 18:30:08
Message-ID: 3781072.1642357808@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 05:58:02PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Here's a version that makes sure that callers specify a write position not
>> an insert position. I also simplified the callers wherever it turned
>> out that they could just use the default parameters.

> LGTM, and passes make check-world on my machine.

Pushed, thanks for reviewing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2022-01-16 20:25:59 Re: Avoiding smgrimmedsync() during nbtree index builds
Previous Message Japin Li 2022-01-16 18:04:03 Re: support for MERGE