Re: Isn't wait_for_catchup slightly broken?

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Isn't wait_for_catchup slightly broken?
Date: 2022-01-16 09:39:38
Message-ID: 20220116093938.xax7wdxbdqy6i5gg@jrouhaud
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 05:58:02PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Here's a version that makes sure that callers specify a write position not
> an insert position. I also simplified the callers wherever it turned
> out that they could just use the default parameters.

LGTM, and passes make check-world on my machine.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Lakhin 2022-01-16 11:00:00 Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-01-16 09:22:07 pg_basebackup WAL streamer shutdown is bogus - leading to slow tests