Re: [BUG] pg_stat_statements and extended query protocol

From: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] pg_stat_statements and extended query protocol
Date: 2023-04-04 21:48:17
Message-ID: 3768989B-01BA-4FA4-A052-AF9A3017508D@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I was looking back at this thread, and the suggestion to use one field
> in EState sounds fine to me. Sami, would you like to send a new
> version of the patch (simplified version based on v1)?

Here is v4.

The "calls" tracking is removed from Estate. Unlike v1 however,
I added a check for the operation type. Inside ExecutorRun,
es_total_processed is incremented when the operation is
a SELECT. This check is done for es_processed as well inside
executorRun -> ExecutePlan.

For non select operations, es_total_processed is set to
es_processed in executorfinish. This is because the modify
plan nodes set es_processed outside of execMain.c

Regards,

Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Fix-row-tracking-in-pg_stat_statements.patch application/octet-stream 3.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-04-04 21:53:19 Re: Parallel Full Hash Join
Previous Message Karl O. Pinc 2023-04-04 21:21:42 Re: doc: add missing "id" attributes to extension packaging page