Re: 2021-09 Commitfest

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
Date: 2021-10-03 13:48:14
Message-ID: 3764600.1633268894@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 7:31 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> That's the tricky part. It does not really make sense either to keep
>> moving patches that are waiting on author for months.

> I'm pretty sure this is the original reason for adding this -- to enforce
> that this review happens.

The CF tool is in no way able to enforce that, though. All it's doing
is making extra work for the CFM.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhihong Yu 2021-10-03 15:51:21 Re: very long record lines in expanded psql output
Previous Message wenjing 2021-10-03 13:15:03 Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables