From: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GUC names in messages |
Date: | 2024-09-04 16:00:00 |
Message-ID: | 36ba4d1b-bc80-e3e2-287f-aacd3199c3d7@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Peter,
[ sorry for the kind of off-topic ]
17.05.2024 14:57, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I committed your 0001 and 0002 now, with some small fixes.
>
> There has also been quite a bit of new code, of course, since you posted your patches, so we'll probably find a few
> more things that could use adjustment.
>
> I'd be happy to consider the rest of your patch set after beta1 and/or for PG18.
While translating messages, I've encountered a weird message, updated by
17974ec25:
printf(_("(in \"wal_sync_method\" preference order, except fdatasync is Linux's default)\n"));
Does "except ..." make sense here or it's just a copy-and-paste from docs?:
The default is the first method in the above list that is supported
by the platform, except that <literal>fdatasync</literal> is the default on
Linux and FreeBSD.
Best regards,
Alexander
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Maxim Orlov | 2024-09-04 16:05:32 | Re: Test 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl faild in installcheck due to missing injection_points |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2024-09-04 15:58:33 | GetRelationPath() vs critical sections |