| From: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed |
| Date: | 1999-01-27 18:49:29 |
| Message-ID: | 36AF5FB9.5F11BBE9@krs.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I have fixed the problem I introduced with aggregates. They should work
> > now, and the HAVING regression test should work too.
>
> Also, I put in Vadim's recommended fix for the subplan problem.
> The regression tests look a lot better than they did. The "union"
> test is still failing by adding a bunch of
>
> NOTICE: equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal
>
> lines to the expected output. Anybody know what's causing that?
Type 600 is Query node. Attempt to compare Queries?
Try gdb with break point @ equalfuncs.c:746...
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-01-27 20:18:47 | Something wacko about EXPLAIN cost stats |
| Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-01-27 18:44:33 | Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI |