Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed
Date: 1999-01-27 18:34:18
Message-ID: 20798.917462058@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I have fixed the problem I introduced with aggregates. They should work
> now, and the HAVING regression test should work too.

Also, I put in Vadim's recommended fix for the subplan problem.
The regression tests look a lot better than they did. The "union"
test is still failing by adding a bunch of

NOTICE: equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal

lines to the expected output. Anybody know what's causing that?

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-01-27 18:44:33 Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-01-27 18:04:18 Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI