| From: | "Just Someone" <just(dot)some(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Postgresql-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | WAL archiving and deletion of the WAL segments |
| Date: | 2006-04-10 16:28:08 |
| Message-ID: | 36932f270604100928y5ac47094pd39cdb302e255809@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I implemented wal archiving and it seems to be working. The segments
are being copied by the shell script, and in the pg_log file I see
this line:
LOG: archived transaction log file "000000010000001D00000096"
But the file is still int he pg_xlog directory. In the documentation I
read that it might either delete or recycle the segment files. As I
still see it in the directory, I want to make absolutely sure my
archiving is working correctly.
So my question is: Is what I'm seeing meaning the WAL archiving is
working? Or should I expect the file to be deleted?
Bye,
Guy.
--
Family management on rails: http://www.famundo.com - coming soon!
My development related blog: http://devblog.famundo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alan Hodgson | 2006-04-10 16:37:01 | Re: WAL archiving and deletion of the WAL segments |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-04-10 16:22:26 | Re: pg_restore 7.4.7 locks itself out |