From: | Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WAL archiving and deletion of the WAL segments |
Date: | 2006-04-10 16:37:01 |
Message-ID: | 200604100937.01537@hal.medialogik.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On April 10, 2006 09:28 am, "Just Someone" <just(dot)some(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I implemented wal archiving and it seems to be working. The segments
> are being copied by the shell script, and in the pg_log file I see
> this line:
>
> LOG: archived transaction log file "000000010000001D00000096"
>
> But the file is still int he pg_xlog directory. In the documentation I
> read that it might either delete or recycle the segment files. As I
> still see it in the directory, I want to make absolutely sure my
> archiving is working correctly.
>
> So my question is: Is what I'm seeing meaning the WAL archiving is
> working? Or should I expect the file to be deleted?
>
If the file is showing up in your archive target location, it's working.
The file will remain in the pg_xlog directory for some time, and then
eventually be recycled. Based on the message, I would say it's working
fine.
--
Alan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-10 16:43:26 | Re: WAL archiving and deletion of the WAL segments |
Previous Message | Just Someone | 2006-04-10 16:28:08 | WAL archiving and deletion of the WAL segments |