From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Olson, Ken" <Ken(dot)Olson(at)pega(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net" <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: dynloader.h missing in prebuilt package for Windows? |
Date: | 2016-01-03 14:57:05 |
Message-ID: | 368765E0-87EE-4DF4-B87D-02BB814C1ED8@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Dec 31, 2015, at 1:04 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:50:13AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:57:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>>> Oops. Once this patch is applied, it is only going to take effect when
>>>> someone _installs_ Postgres. Even an initdb will not add the file.
>>>> This means that upgrading to the next minor release will _not_ fix this.
>>>
>>> Uh, what? Surely an upgrade to a new package *would* fix it, because
>>> that is a reinstall at the filesystem level. This patch has nothing
>>> to do with system catalog contents, which is what initdb would be
>>> concerned with.
>>
>> Uh, do we install hew lib files and stuff in a minor upgrade? I guess
>> we do, yeah.
>
> Let's hold this for 9.5.1 and all minor releases will get it at the same
> time.
I vote for going ahead with this at once. It seems low risk, and having 9.5.1 install different files from 9.5.0 seems like an unnecessary annoyance.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-01-03 15:34:53 | Re: Avoiding pin scan during btree vacuum |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2016-01-03 13:26:44 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |