Re: dynloader.h missing in prebuilt package for Windows?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Olson, Ken" <Ken(dot)Olson(at)pega(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net" <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Subject: Re: dynloader.h missing in prebuilt package for Windows?
Date: 2016-01-03 17:35:02
Message-ID: 26276.1451842502@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Dec 31, 2015, at 1:04 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Let's hold this for 9.5.1 and all minor releases will get it at the same
>> time.

> I vote for going ahead with this at once. It seems low risk, and having 9.5.1 install different files from 9.5.0 seems like an unnecessary annoyance.

If we're willing to allow 9.4.6 to install different files than 9.4.5
does, I don't see why it's a problem for 9.5.1. But having said that,
I agree that this seems pretty low-risk, and so IMO we might as well
ship it sooner not later.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-01-03 17:43:39 Re: \x auto and EXPLAIN
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-01-03 17:23:20 Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly?