Re: [fixed] Trigger test

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dmitrii Bondar <d(dot)bondar(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Lilian <ontowhee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [fixed] Trigger test
Date: 2025-04-07 19:57:25
Message-ID: 3668853.1744055845@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Dmitrii Bondar <d(dot)bondar(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
>> I considered removing it entirely, but that seemed too drastic a
>> solution (and, at the very least, I don't have enough expertise to make
>> that decision).

> I'm not that thrilled with giving up on refint.c either. But in its
> current state, it's a pretty lousy example. Are we willing to put
> enough effort into making it a more useful code example?

I concluded that we might as well commit what we've got, since the
window for v18 is closing fast and there's not time to consider
anything more invasive. Hence, pushed. I hope you will consider
spending some effort on fixing the other problems identified in
this thread.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2025-04-07 20:01:33 Re: [PATCH] Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2025-04-07 19:54:28 [Question: linux pipes ( ... | gzip | cat ... ) in tests failing] Re: [PATCH] Adding pg_dump flag for parallel export to pipes