From: | "Hartman, Matthew" <Matthew(dot)Hartman(at)krcc(dot)on(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | "Grzegorz Jaskiewicz" <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Vacuum on the database versus individual tables. |
Date: | 2009-06-25 15:30:39 |
Message-ID: | 366642367C5B354197A1E0D27BC175BD0225979B@KGHMAIL.KGH.ON.CA |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Windows XP, PostgreSQL 8.3.5, using pgAdmin III 1.8.4. It's the typical "Running vacuum on this table is recommended" dialog box.
Matthew Hartman
Programmer/Analyst
Information Management, ICP
Kingston General Hospital
(613) 549-6666 x4294
-----Original Message-----
From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz [mailto:gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 11:25 AM
To: Hartman, Matthew
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum on the database versus individual tables.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Hartman,
Matthew<Matthew(dot)Hartman(at)krcc(dot)on(dot)ca> wrote:
> On occasion I'll perform a full vacuum on a database but will still receive
> a suggestion to vacuum an individual table immediately after. Does the full
> database vacuum not handle each individual table?
What's the exact message, what OS, what pg version, how do you call vacuum.
--
GJ
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Spotts | 2009-06-25 15:40:34 | planned recovery from a certain transaction |
Previous Message | Pedro Doria Meunier | 2009-06-25 15:29:39 | Re: Upgrade |