Re: Vacuum on the database versus individual tables.

From: "Hartman, Matthew" <Matthew(dot)Hartman(at)krcc(dot)on(dot)ca>
To: "Grzegorz Jaskiewicz" <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum on the database versus individual tables.
Date: 2009-06-25 15:30:39
Message-ID: 366642367C5B354197A1E0D27BC175BD0225979B@KGHMAIL.KGH.ON.CA
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Windows XP, PostgreSQL 8.3.5, using pgAdmin III 1.8.4. It's the typical "Running vacuum on this table is recommended" dialog box.

Matthew Hartman
Programmer/Analyst
Information Management, ICP
Kingston General Hospital
(613) 549-6666 x4294

-----Original Message-----
From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz [mailto:gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 11:25 AM
To: Hartman, Matthew
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum on the database versus individual tables.

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Hartman,
Matthew<Matthew(dot)Hartman(at)krcc(dot)on(dot)ca> wrote:
> On occasion I'll perform a full vacuum on a database but will still receive
> a suggestion to vacuum an individual table immediately after. Does the full
> database vacuum not handle each individual table?

What's the exact message, what OS, what pg version, how do you call vacuum.

--
GJ

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Spotts 2009-06-25 15:40:34 planned recovery from a certain transaction
Previous Message Pedro Doria Meunier 2009-06-25 15:29:39 Re: Upgrade