Re: Vacuum on the database versus individual tables.

From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hartman, Matthew" <Matthew(dot)Hartman(at)krcc(dot)on(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum on the database versus individual tables.
Date: 2009-06-25 15:52:00
Message-ID: 2f4958ff0906250852g1e63a3f1o6ccd801d120a3141@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2009/6/25 Hartman, Matthew <Matthew(dot)Hartman(at)krcc(dot)on(dot)ca>:
> Windows XP, PostgreSQL 8.3.5, using pgAdmin III 1.8.4. It's the typical "Running vacuum on this table is recommended" dialog box.

Well, it really has nothing to do with postgresql it self. Either it
is a bug or property of PgAdmin, but I don't know.
Either someone who knows more about pgadmin is going to respond here,
or you have to ask on pgadmin list.

--
GJ

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2009-06-25 15:59:31 Re: Vacuum on the database versus individual tables.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-06-25 15:50:35 Re: PG 8.3.7 initdb -E LATIN1 fails on Windows