Re: Precedence of NOT LIKE, NOT BETWEEN, etc

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 01:14:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> Also, it strikes me that we could significantly reduce, maybe even fully
>>>> eliminate, the funny behaviors around the existing base_yylex()
>>>> substitutions if we made them use the same idea, ie replace the leading
>>>> token with something special but keep the second token's separate
>>>> identity. Unless somebody sees a hole in this idea, I'll probably go
>>>> do that and then come back to the precedence issues.

>>> IIRC that's exactly what the earlier patch for this did.

>> Right, see d809fd0008a2e26de463f47b7aba0365264078f3

> Where are we on this?

It's done as far as seemed reasonable to push it.

regards, tom lane