Re: Precedence of NOT LIKE, NOT BETWEEN, etc

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 01:14:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Also, it strikes me that we could significantly reduce, maybe even fully
> >> eliminate, the funny behaviors around the existing base_yylex()
> >> substitutions if we made them use the same idea, ie replace the leading
> >> token with something special but keep the second token's separate
> >> identity. Unless somebody sees a hole in this idea, I'll probably go
> >> do that and then come back to the precedence issues.
>
> > IIRC that's exactly what the earlier patch for this did.
>
> Right, see d809fd0008a2e26de463f47b7aba0365264078f3

Where are we on this?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +