Re: [HACKERS] LinuxPPC problems

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LinuxPPC problems
Date: 1998-09-03 16:01:40
Message-ID: 35EEBD64.FE0F8C32@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Here is current status.
>
> FreeBSD LinuxPPC(-O0) LinuxPPC(-O2)
>
> constraints GOOD NG NG
> create_function1 GOOD GOOD GOOD
> create_function2 GOOD GOOD GOOD
> select_having GOOD GOOD GOOD
> select_views GOOD NG NG
> triggers GOOD GOOD GOOD
>
> After Bruce's, fix 4 NGs in LinuxPPC(-O2) turned to GOOD. Also, -O0
> and -O2 now show same results. Excellent! Thanks Bruce.

Ah, by Tatsuo's measures I'm getting similar results on Linux/i686 as he
is getting on Linux/PPC. I have failures on constraints and
select_index, but neither are core dumps, and both involve not finding
tables (probably index or index cache corruption on pg_class). The other
regression tests which fail are due to tables or information missing
from the tests listed by Tatsuo or myself.

btw, I'm pretty sure that the select_views problem pre-dates the OID and
index patches.

David made the recent observation that my symptoms are likely due to a
damaged index, not a damaged pg_class table. So indices (or something
related) are still suspect. Remember that at least one of my symptoms is
from a table which had been destroyed and then recreated. Don't know if
that is relevant...

The only thing I haven't done yet to refresh source code is to pull a
*completely new* cvs tree from postgresql.org. However, since I'm
getting the same results as Tatsuo I think CVSup is treating me OK, so
won't try that (yet).

Off to work now.

- Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-09-03 16:50:18 Re: [HACKERS] LinuxPPC problems
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-09-03 15:37:31 Re: [HACKERS] Adding PRIMARY KEY info