From: | David Hartwig <daybee(at)bellatlantic(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. |
Date: | 1998-09-02 20:33:55 |
Message-ID: | 35EDABB2.7AD2B56D@bellatlantic.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I submitted two patch patches to fix the select_having test. The first patch addressed problems caused by
> > a machine dependency on the degree of accuracy of datetime. CVS is currently showing this first patch.
> >
> > The second patch was to fix my first patch. It has NOT been applied yet. The problem with he first
> > patch, which you are seeing now, is that the test case demonstrates another bug which has nothing to do
> > with having. It has to do with GROUPing by a function and the argument of the function not appearing
> > elsewhere in the target list. Weird! In any case the latest patch will fix the regression.
> >
> > BTW, I have also sent one other patch that I am waiting to see in CVS. These one is an interim AND/OR
> > memory exhaustion fix.
>
> Yes, I am behind on the patch applications. Marc probably stopped while
> I did my mega-cleanup, and I have been scratching my head on the
> platform failures. Hopefully one of us will get it soon.
> bug.
No rush, I can see you're synapses are all firing on this index bug. Just a reminder so it doesn't fall
through the cracks.
More important, am relieved (in advance) that you have found the problem in the index code.
Can I assume there will be a snapshot I can get tomorrow from my business location to try out on my AIX box? I
am anxious to know this is behind us.
Appreciation :)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Keith Parks | 1998-09-02 21:02:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-09-02 17:54:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests. |