Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com (David Hartwig)
Cc: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk, szybist(at)boxhill(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.
Date: 1998-09-02 17:54:03
Message-ID: 199809021754.NAA06604@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I submitted two patch patches to fix the select_having test. The first patch addressed problems caused by
> a machine dependency on the degree of accuracy of datetime. CVS is currently showing this first patch.
>
> The second patch was to fix my first patch. It has NOT been applied yet. The problem with he first
> patch, which you are seeing now, is that the test case demonstrates another bug which has nothing to do
> with having. It has to do with GROUPing by a function and the argument of the function not appearing
> elsewhere in the target list. Weird! In any case the latest patch will fix the regression.
>
> BTW, I have also sent one other patch that I am waiting to see in CVS. These one is an interim AND/OR
> memory exhaustion fix.

Yes, I am behind on the patch applications. Marc probably stopped while
I did my mega-cleanup, and I have been scratching my head on the
platform failures. Hopefully one of us will get it soon.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Hartwig 1998-09-02 20:33:55 Re: [HACKERS] Core dump in regression tests.
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-09-02 16:45:12 Re: SQL package (fwd)