From: | Pailloncy Jean-Gerard <jg(at)rilk(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples |
Date: | 2005-09-02 17:21:23 |
Message-ID: | 35A8B239-F1AE-472B-8D07-670F8FC33CE7@rilk.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> [skip]
> happening in the bgwriter's inner loop. Even more to the point, you
> can't do such changes without getting a superexclusive lock on the
> page
> (not only locked, but no one else has it pinned), which is a real
> nonstarter for the bgwriter, both for performance and possible
> deadlock
> issues.
Hi Tom,
I do not want to discuss in deep the place to do this job, it is
really over my head.
But, you said you need a "super-exclusive lock", and I wonder if a
wait-free algorithm would be good for pg in a general manner.
I have given some references about it already on the list.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-02/msg00263.php
Cordialement,
Jean-Gérard Pailloncy
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-02 17:40:04 | Re: Two different defs of MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE |
Previous Message | AgentM | 2005-09-02 17:11:21 | Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch |