| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unsupported version mentioned at Using EXPLAIN |
| Date: | 2021-05-07 14:43:56 |
| Message-ID: | 35128.1620398636@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> On 2021-May-07, tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
>> Maybe we can just remove the specific PG version. Say "using current development sources." Thoughts?
> I think there's more to this than just changing or removing the version
> number; a better approach might be to update the documentation so that
> it matches what current versions do.
Yeah. The reason why a specific version is mentioned is exactly that
the details tend to change. I don't know if anyone else has touched
that text, but when I've done so it's been exactly the sort of effort
you mention: run through all the examples in that file and make them
match current reality. I don't think just taking out the version
number is a good idea.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-05-07 15:34:08 | RE: Unsupported version mentioned at Using EXPLAIN |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-05-07 14:24:25 | Re: Unsupported version mentioned at Using EXPLAIN |