From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Make cancel request keys longer |
Date: | 2025-04-09 08:53:20 |
Message-ID: | 34d5d731-06cc-43af-88cd-b3a4c5c8d9df@iki.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 08/04/2025 22:41, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 08/04/2025 20:06, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> While I was looking at this, I suggest to make the first argument void
>> *. This is consistent for passing binary data.
>
> Ok, sure.
On second thoughts, -1 on that. 'void *' is appropriate for functions
like libc's read() or pq_sendbytes(), where the buffer can point to
anything. In other words, the caller is expected to have a pointer like
'foobar *', and it gets cast to 'void *' when you call the function.
That's not the case with the cancellation key. The cancellation key is
just an array of bytes, the caller is expected to pass an array of
bytes, not a struct.
The right precedent for that are e.g. SCRAM functions in scram-common.h,
for example. They use "const uint8 *" for the hashes.
I'll switch to "const uint *" everywhere that deals with cancel keys.
There are a few more variables elsewhere in the backend and in libpq.
> Looks good to me. I can commit these tomorrow, or feel free to do it
> yourself too.
I'm on this now.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-04-09 09:39:49 | Re: pgsql: Make cancel request keys longer |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-04-09 07:33:19 | pgsql: Perform missed catversion bump |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2025-04-09 09:18:25 | Re: Memoize ANTI and SEMI JOIN inner |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-04-09 08:42:36 | Re: [PATCH] New predefined role pg_manage_extensions |