Re: pgsql: Make cancel request keys longer

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Make cancel request keys longer
Date: 2025-04-08 19:41:31
Message-ID: 09323e6a-4743-4be2-9d7f-74b86e4dac64@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On 08/04/2025 20:06, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 02.04.25 15:43, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Make cancel request keys longer
>
> This patch changed the signature of ProcSignal()
>
> -ProcSignalInit(bool cancel_key_valid, int32 cancel_key)
> +ProcSignalInit(char *cancel_key, int cancel_key_len)
>
> but did not update the caller in auxprocess.c:
>
> ProcSignalInit(false, 0);
>
> This gives a warning with clang.

Good catch. I wonder why the cirrus CI didn't complain, it has a step to
check for warnings with clang.

> While I was looking at this, I suggest to make the first argument void
> *.  This is consistent for passing binary data.

Ok, sure.

> Also, I wonder why MyCancelKeyLength is of type uint8 rather than
> something more mundane like int.  There doesn't seem to be any API
> reason for this type.

Agreed. The cancel key length is documented to be at most 256 bytes, but
that's more of a coincidence, nothing depends on that variable being uint8.

> See attached patch for possible changes.

Looks good to me. I can commit these tomorrow, or feel free to do it
yourself too.

Thank you!

--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-04-08 21:22:04 pgsql: Rename argument in pg_get_process_memory_contexts().
Previous Message Wolfgang Walther 2025-04-08 17:54:55 Re: pgsql: Add support for basic NUMA awareness

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2025-04-08 19:51:54 Re: Move tests of contrib/spi/ out of the core regression tests
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2025-04-08 19:41:06 Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects