Re: [HACKERS] ecpg stuff

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ecpg stuff
Date: 1998-02-17 15:45:16
Message-ID: 34E9B08C.B38DD7CC@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Joking aside, there is one bug or better missing feature that I need some
> input on. Does anyone know what the standards say to the prepare command? Is
> dynamic SQL a standard?

Yes it is. I have the Date/Darwen book on the SQL standard, and can look up
answers in the book if you like...

- Tom

In response to

  • ecpg stuff at 1998-02-16 08:53:16 from Michael Meskes

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-02-17 15:55:34 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] agregate function sum error
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-02-17 15:41:50 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: Subselects open issue Nr. 5