Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: Subselects open issue Nr. 5

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SARZ <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: Subselects open issue Nr. 5
Date: 1998-02-17 15:41:50
Message-ID: 34E9AFBE.74572FC7@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I prefer "logical point of view" and vote for Oracle-like behaviour.
> BTW, it's easy to implement...

Sorry I haven't had time to look up the standard. However, in the absence of
that I vote for the "logical point of view" also. This is better called the
"intuitive point of view"?

- Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-02-17 15:45:16 Re: [HACKERS] ecpg stuff
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-02-17 15:37:31 Re: [HACKERS] makefiles/Makefile.linux of 2/15 snapshop