Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: teunis <teunis(at)mauve(dot)computersupportcentre(dot)com>, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests
Date: 1998-02-02 01:54:12
Message-ID: 34D52744.11BAF7CC@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > JDBC works
> > postgres works
> > platform : linux (I'm not posting kernel version! it doesn't matter!! :)
> > egcs-2.91.06 (gcc-2.8.0 with haifa scheduler + other updates)
> > glibc-2.0.5c from RedHat-5.0 distrib - should be stable
> > [but with full crypt, locale]
> >
> > But : Here's output from regression tests:
> > Is there anything wrong with the failed tests? (is it known?)
>
> I get the same regression output. checkresults shows you the problems,
> and it mostly error message words or rounding.

Hmm. A linux box is used to generate the expected results, so we need to be
more careful here. I suspect that you have date/time trouble reported earlier
by (Oliver?? can't find the e-mail, sorry). A few of the math functions in
glibc2.0.x were misbehaving, leading to troubles like '3 hours 59 minutes 60
seconds' rather than '4 hours' in timespan output.

That person submitted patches, but they were pretty specific to the glibc2
problems. Of course, I've already got some ugly code in there because Solaris
had some similar broken math, so perhaps we should figure out how to extract
all of the busted code into the port-specific files?

- Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-02-02 01:58:08 Re: [HACKERS] Variable block size...
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-02-02 01:43:02 Re: [HACKERS] psort fixed