Re: [HACKERS] psort fixed

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psort fixed
Date: 1998-02-02 01:43:02
Message-ID: 34D524A6.791D3755@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I have fixed the regression test problem. The original psort() NULL
> handling patch is attached. It made the while() into a for() which is
> good, but he did not remove the increment at the bottom or the for(), so
> nkey was being incremented twice in the loop. Fixed it, and now
> regression looks good to me.

We be stylin' now... Nice.

- Tom

In response to

  • psort fixed at 1998-02-01 22:41:45 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-02-02 01:54:12 Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests
Previous Message Darren King 1998-02-02 01:21:27 Variable block size...