| From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Patch for glibc2 date problems |
| Date: | 1998-01-16 02:16:32 |
| Message-ID: | 34BEC300.F023392F@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> The patch for glibc2 dates is attached. With this applied, a Linux system
> with libc6 (glibc2) passes all the date and time related regression tests.
It looks as though this patch is a bit Linux-specific (or specific to some version of glibc which has only been tested on
Linux).
Can we wait until glibc2 settles down, or provide this as an add-on patch rather than merging it into the main tree? I hate
adding machine-specific code into otherwise general code...
Another possibility would be to add a new #define variable like HAVE_FUNNY_LIBRARY in config.h or in linux.h so we can
possibly use this with other ports if necessary in the future.
I'm planning on installing RH5.0 sometime soon (I have a clean disk so can fall back to RH4.2). I'm sure I'll sound more
sympathetic by then :)
- Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Micha Mosiewicz | 1998-01-16 02:35:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: New pg_pwd patch and stuff |
| Previous Message | neil d. quiogue | 1998-01-16 01:04:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Arrays (inserting and removing) |