| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Viktor Holmberg <v(at)viktorh(dot)net> |
| Cc: | daniel(at)yesql(dot)se, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ISN extension - wrong volatility level for isn_weak() function |
| Date: | 2025-03-15 16:22:03 |
| Message-ID: | 3481904.1742055723@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Viktor Holmberg <v(at)viktorh(dot)net> writes:
> On 14 Mar 2025 at 16:18 +0000, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, wrote:
>> No, we'd need to create an update script that uses ALTER FUNCTION.
>> Extension scripts are basically frozen once shipped.
> Ah, thanks for the clarification. I’ve attached a patch that fixes the volatility. I thought it best to at least get some feedback on that before I try to dust off my C knowledge and try to fix the GUC stuff.
Uh .. looks like you attached a patch for something else altogether.
If you want a sample extension-updating patch to look at, you
could see 44ba2920644903d7dfceda810e5facdbcbab58a8, or lots of
other examples.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-03-15 17:22:57 | Re: BUG #18845: DEREF_OF_NULL.RET guc_malloc possibly returns NULL |
| Previous Message | Viktor Holmberg | 2025-03-15 15:32:39 | Re: ISN extension - wrong volatility level for isn_weak() function |