Re: 8.3: timestamp subtraction

From: Havasvölgyi Ottó <havasvolgyi(dot)otto(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Christophe <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, Pg - General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.3: timestamp subtraction
Date: 2009-05-24 09:00:46
Message-ID: 34608c0c0905240200g43b03c18rb3ebd85ef157a7f9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks Tom for your comments.

I meant the build in this directory:
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/v8.3.6/win32/, and the builds for win32
of other versions in the binary directory.
What is the trend of these builds regarding floating point timestamps? For
example what about 8.4?

Thanks,
Otto

2009/5/24 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>

> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Havasv=F6lgyi_Ott=F3?= <havasvolgyi(dot)otto(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Thanks, It's off in both 8.2 and 8.3.
>
> As was already stated, that depends on which build you're using.
> (And no, "the Win32 distribution on the PgSql site" is not a unique
> description, not even for a single PG version.)
>
> > What will be the default in 8.4?
>
> The same comment will apply to 8.4. There is a general trend away from
> floating point timestamps, but there will probably be some builds
> continuing to use them for a long time to come, because of compatibility
> considerations.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mnavahan 2009-05-24 09:34:46 Re: do postgresql this job for me ? (firebird user)
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2009-05-24 08:09:53 Re: do postgresql this job for me ? (firebird user)