From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Havasvölgyi Ottó <havasvolgyi(dot)otto(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Christophe <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, Pg - General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.3: timestamp subtraction |
Date: | 2009-05-23 22:41:20 |
Message-ID: | 13504.1243118480@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Havasv=F6lgyi_Ott=F3?= <havasvolgyi(dot)otto(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks, It's off in both 8.2 and 8.3.
As was already stated, that depends on which build you're using.
(And no, "the Win32 distribution on the PgSql site" is not a unique
description, not even for a single PG version.)
> What will be the default in 8.4?
The same comment will apply to 8.4. There is a general trend away from
floating point timestamps, but there will probably be some builds
continuing to use them for a long time to come, because of compatibility
considerations.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Conrad Lender | 2009-05-23 22:43:33 | Re: Code tables, conditional foreign keys? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-23 22:31:42 | Re: Excessive (?) Pg file descriptor use when partitioning |