Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>, LaurenzAlbe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates
Date: 2024-07-16 20:26:59
Message-ID: 3430161.1721161619@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Fair enough, but then I think we should change the documentation to not
> say "forever".

No objection to that, it's clearly a misleading definition.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2024-07-16 20:27:28 Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-07-16 20:25:48 Re: Converting tab-complete.c's else-if chain to a switch