| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2 |
| Date: | 2020-02-05 15:21:11 |
| Message-ID: | 3389.1580916071@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the
> way that it is, I think we shouldn't make it without more plus votes.
> If we've actually got a broad consensus on it, sure, but I don't think
> 4 votes is a broad consensus.
Fair point. I'm still abstaining, but maybe this should be proposed
on pgsql-general to try to get more opinions?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-02-05 15:40:59 | Re: Is custom MemoryContext prohibited? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-02-05 15:20:05 | Re: Is custom MemoryContext prohibited? |