From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2 |
Date: | 2020-02-06 02:38:20 |
Message-ID: | 20200206023820.GF23913@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:21:11AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the
>> way that it is, I think we shouldn't make it without more plus votes.
>> If we've actually got a broad consensus on it, sure, but I don't think
>> 4 votes is a broad consensus.
>
> Fair point. I'm still abstaining, but maybe this should be proposed
> on pgsql-general to try to get more opinions?
Indeed, still I am not sure what kind of number is enough to define a
large consensus. Vik, could you start a new thread on -general?
FWIW, 24 hours later I am counting two more people in favor (Magnus
and Fabien), for a total of 7, with one abstention and one not in
favor.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-02-06 02:46:38 | Re: Is custom MemoryContext prohibited? |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2020-02-06 02:35:41 | Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side |