Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com, vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com, pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com, lukas(at)fittl(dot)com, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date: 2023-02-26 20:08:33
Message-ID: 33570.1677442113@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> They're all animals for testing older LLVM versions. They're using
> pretty old clang versions. phycodurus and dragonet are clang 3.9, petalura and
> desmoxytes is clang 4, idiacanthus and pogona are clang 5.

[ shrug ... ] If I thought this was actually good code, I might
agree with ignoring these warnings; but I think what it mostly is
is misleading overcomplication.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-02-26 20:12:27 Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-02-26 20:06:14 Re: tests against running server occasionally fail, postgres_fdw & tenk1