From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: tests against running server occasionally fail, postgres_fdw & tenk1 |
Date: | 2023-02-26 20:06:14 |
Message-ID: | 20230226200614.2h4jblgecie4vnz7@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2023-02-26 14:51:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2022-12-08 16:15:11 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> The most frequent case is postgres_fdw, which somewhat regularly fails with a
> >> regression.diff like this:
> >> WHERE application_name = 'fdw_retry_check';
> >> pg_terminate_backend
> >> ----------------------
> >> - t
> >> -(1 row)
> >> +(0 rows)
>
> > Unless somebody comes up with a way to make the test more reliable pretty
> > soon, I think we should just remove it. It's one of the most frequently
> > flapping tests at the moment.
>
> If that's the only diff, we could just hide it, say by writing
>
> do $$ begin
> PERFORM pg_terminate_backend(pid, 180000) FROM pg_stat_activity
> WHERE application_name = 'fdw_retry_check';
> end $$;
>
> The actually important thing is the failure check after this;
> we don't care that much whether the initially-created connection
> is still live at this point.
Hm, yea, that should work. It's indeed the entirety of the diff
https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/4718859714822144/testrun/build/testrun/postgres_fdw-running/regress/regression.diffs
If we go that way we can remove the debug_discard muckery as well, I think?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-02-26 20:08:33 | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-02-26 19:53:53 | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) |