Re: Finally upgrading to 9.6!

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Finally upgrading to 9.6!
Date: 2017-10-18 17:26:54
Message-ID: 330baca7-112c-faeb-e8bc-aabbc803c919@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/18/2017 08:49 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 10/18/2017 10:16 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:
>> On 10/18/2017 7:45 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> On 10/18/2017 09:34 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:
>>>> A bit off-topic here, but why upgrade to 9.6 when you can upgrade to
>>>> 10.0?
>>>
>>> There's no way we're going to put an x.0.0 version into production.
>>
>> Then think of it as 9.7.0 but with an easier name to pronounce ;)
>
> No .0 is going into production...
>

I am not sure why this is even a question. There are plenty of
businesses that can risk the deployment of a .0 release but there are
also *MANY THAT CAN NOT*. The proper way to do this is to have a staging
server running the .0 release that gets beaten on by the application for
a few months and reports anything back to the community they find.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc

PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vik Fearing 2017-10-18 17:30:03 Re: Table partionning : INSERT with inconsistent return ligne inserted.
Previous Message Melvin Davidson 2017-10-18 15:57:03 Re: Finally upgrading to 9.6!