From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Add PSQL_WATCH_PAGER for psql's \watch command. |
Date: | 2021-07-13 17:40:27 |
Message-ID: | 3278308.1626198027@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Here's a better patch.
I didn't like the way you'd done this as two independent tests;
the second one falsely reports success if there isn't actually
any declaration of sigwait. I see you hacked around that by
checking both results in c.h, but the printed result is still
very misleading. Plus it's a waste of time to run the second
test at all, if the first one fails.
Here's a revised patch that I've tested (albeit lightly) on
both HPUX and Solaris. I also got rid of the independent
check in thread_test.c, since that's always been a hack
that delivers a misleading complaint when it fails.
Personally, I'd skip adding the stanza in c.h in favor of just
making configure set USE_SIGWAIT directly, but perhaps you
see it differently.
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Portability-fixes-for-sigwait-2.patch | text/x-diff | 9.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-07-13 18:17:04 | Re: pgsql: Add PSQL_WATCH_PAGER for psql's \watch command. |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-07-13 11:55:57 | Re: pgsql: Add PSQL_WATCH_PAGER for psql's \watch command. |