| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: objsubid vs subobjid |
| Date: | 2017-03-01 17:24:19 |
| Message-ID: | 31a88eb0-8ef7-e1e7-affe-daecb50aee32@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/1/17 09:51, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2/22/17 19:35, Jim Nasby wrote:
>>> pg_get_object_address() currently returns a field called subobjid, while
>>> pg_depend calls that objsubid. I'm guessing that wasn't on purpose
>>> (especially because internally the function uses objsubid), and it'd be
>>> nice to fix it.
>>
>> I'm in favor of changing it, but it could theoretically break someone's
>> code.
>
> Yes, it was an oversight. +1 for changing.
OK done.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2017-03-01 17:26:42 | Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-03-01 17:23:00 | Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless) |