Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories
Date: 2021-04-13 14:12:35
Message-ID: 3188888.1618323155@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 01:40:52AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps ... what did you have in mind?

> The first sentence of the page now says that:
> "The following parameters are intended for work on the PostgreSQL
> source code, and in some cases to assist with recovery of severely
> damaged databases."

> That does not stick with force_parallel_mode IMO. Maybe:
> "The following parameters are intended for development work related to
> PostgreSQL. Some of them work on the PostgreSQL source code, some of
> them can be used to control the run-time behavior of the server, and
> in some cases they can be used to assist with the recovery of severely
> damaged databases."

I think that's overly wordy. Maybe

The following parameters are intended for developer testing, and
should never be enabled for production work. However, some of
them can be used to assist with the recovery of severely
damaged databases.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2021-04-13 14:25:38 Re: TRUNCATE on foreign table
Previous Message Zhihong Yu 2021-04-13 14:07:52 Re: Have I found an interval arithmetic bug?

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Friedman 2021-04-13 16:33:48 RE: LWLocks by LockManager slowing large DB
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2021-04-13 12:31:39 Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories