From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning |
Date: | 2025-02-21 15:55:03 |
Message-ID: | 3132441.1740153303@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The short of it is that the cached-plan-inval test in the
> delay_execution suite can never be made to work under
> CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS. The test assumes that locks on partitions for a
> reused generic plan are not taken until InitPlan(). However, under
> CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, generic plans are never reused, so the test's
> assumption never holds.
Ugh.
> I see two possible ways to address this:
> 1. Find a way to disable the cached-plan-inval test in
> CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS builds. However, I haven't found any other test
> that does this.
> 2. Remove the test altogether, though that might be too drastic.
Well, you could force matters with "set debug_discard_caches = 0"
within the test, but I think that's just a band-aid that would
not make the test fully stable. The point of CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS
is to model random arrival of cache flush events, which is *always*
a possibility due to background activity (autovacuum for instance).
We do have a couple of other regression tests that rely on
"set debug_discard_caches = 0", and I've not seen many buildfarm
failures tracing to that, but I don't trust it a whole lot.
How badly do you want to keep this test case? It seems fairly
rickety to me, even without this particular concern.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2025-02-21 16:04:49 | Re: TAP test started using meson, can get a tcp port already used by another test. |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2025-02-21 15:50:14 | Re: TAP test started using meson, can get a tcp port already used by another test. |