Re: Allow pg_dumpall to work without pg_authid

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allow pg_dumpall to work without pg_authid
Date: 2017-03-22 02:13:18
Message-ID: 30b4dff5-b8ca-b662-c546-2d41356007df@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/13/17 16:41, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Why this?

No answer. Can we remove this chunk?

> + if (no_role_passwords && binary_upgrade)
> + {
> + fprintf(stderr, _("%s: options --no-role-passwords and
> --binary-upgrade cannot be used together\n"),
> + progname);
> + fprintf(stderr, _("Try \"%s --help\" for more information.\n"),
> + progname);
> + exit_nicely(1);
> + }

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-03-22 02:18:33 Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-22 02:12:18 Re: Updating the "tool sets" documentation for modern FreeBSD