Re: Clang 3.3 Analyzer Results

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, "noloader(at)gmail(dot)com" <noloader(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Clang 3.3 Analyzer Results
Date: 2013-11-20 03:38:39
Message-ID: 30910.1384918719@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> With the attached patch, that warning goes way, and the logic is
> arguably slightly clearer, too.

No objection.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Edson Richter 2013-11-20 03:41:48 Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2013-11-20 03:30:10 Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Ramsey 2013-11-20 04:08:21 Re: Traffic jams in fn_extra
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-11-20 03:32:20 Re: Traffic jams in fn_extra