From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, "noloader(at)gmail(dot)com" <noloader(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Clang 3.3 Analyzer Results |
Date: | 2013-11-20 03:38:39 |
Message-ID: | 30910.1384918719@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> With the attached patch, that warning goes way, and the logic is
> arguably slightly clearer, too.
No objection.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Edson Richter | 2013-11-20 03:41:48 | Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database? |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-11-20 03:30:10 | Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paul Ramsey | 2013-11-20 04:08:21 | Re: Traffic jams in fn_extra |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-20 03:32:20 | Re: Traffic jams in fn_extra |