| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Quoting of psql \d output |
| Date: | 2003-12-23 15:00:40 |
| Message-ID: | 3076.1072191640@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> psql \d always double-quotes table names:
> Yes, and that is conforming to message style rules. Please leave it at that.
The problem is that it is double-quoting a qualified name, which is
something we generally don't produce in messages. I think it's actively
misleading.
A simpler but uglier solution would be to quote the schema and table
names separately:
Table "public"."foo"
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-23 15:00:42 | Re: Quoting of psql \d output |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-23 14:32:30 | Re: Quoting of psql \d output |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-23 15:00:42 | Re: Quoting of psql \d output |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-23 14:32:30 | Re: Quoting of psql \d output |