| From: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Quoting of psql \d output |
| Date: | 2003-12-23 17:12:11 |
| Message-ID: | 3066.62.158.111.153.1072199531.squirrel@new.host.name |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane writes:
> The problem is that it is double-quoting a qualified name, which is
> something we generally don't produce in messages. I think it's actively
> misleading.
While I don't really agree that this is a problem, better solutions would
be to not quote the thing at all or write something like Table "%s"
(Schema "%s"). However, the message style guidelines are very clear on
this point, and before we deviate I'd like to see an adjusted proposal.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-12-23 17:13:34 | Re: Quoting of psql \d output |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-12-23 17:04:44 | Re: Quoting of psql \d output |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-12-23 17:13:34 | Re: Quoting of psql \d output |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-12-23 17:04:44 | Re: Quoting of psql \d output |